This article features some Bird Kingdom BIF test images captured handheld with an M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS zoom. As regular readers know, Bird Kingdom in Niagara Falls is one of my favourite spots to visit… especially when wild bird migration periods are over.
NOTE: Click on images to enlarge.

The facility has two primary viewing areas where the captive birds are allowed to fly freely.

Bird Kingdom is one of the largest facilities of its kind in terms of having free flying birds… however the space is obviously very cramped when compared to being outdoors in a natural environment.

From a composition standpoint, virtually all of my Bird Kingdom BIF test images ended up with busy, distracting backgrounds.

This was to be expected when shooting inside a building… so I wasn’t anticipating that I’d have any ‘keepers’ from my visit.

My main objectives were simply to practice my eye/hand coordination and shutter release timing.

In the past when visiting Bird Kingdom I have concentrated my efforts on perched birds with the intent of working on my composition skills, and using some slower shutter speeds.

With this visit I accepted the reality that using a shutter speed of 1/2500 in an indoor environment would push my ISO values up. As you can see in the image above, and the next two that follow… I pushed things up to ISO-16000 a few times.

The resulting quality wasn’t great at ISO-16000… but that’s why I like to push my camera gear when doing test images.

It allows me to establish realistic shooting boundaries given the specific lighting conditions that I’m facing.

Even at ISO-16000 my photographs were underexposed… as were many of my images at ISO-6400… leading to noise reduction that was more aggressive than usual.

The Scarlett Ibis birds provided a few opportunities for some precise moment captures when they were just launching into flight.




Two of my favourite Bird Kingdom BIF test images were of a Barbary Dove illustrated above, and the Zebra Finch below.

Capturing these Bird Kingdom BIF test images was a good opportunity to get in some practice time with the M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS zoom lens.
Technical Note
Photographs were captured handheld with the camera equipment noted in the EXIF data. All images were created from RAW files using my standard process in post. This is the 1,424 article published on this website since its original inception in 2015.
Copyright
Word of mouth is the best form of endorsement. If you like our website please let your friends and associates know about our work. Linking to this site or to specific articles is allowed with proper acknowledgement. Reproducing articles, or any of the images contained in them, on another website or in any social media posting is a Copyright infringement.
Article and images are Copyright 2024 Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, duplication or adaptation of any kind is allowed without written consent. If you see this article reproduced anywhere else it is an unauthorized and illegal use. Posting comments on offending websites and calling out individuals who steal intellectual property is always appreciated!
Do you use a Noise reduction software?
Hi Tina,
Yes I use the DeepPRIME in DxO PhotoLab 7 up to a value of 15. Then I use Topaz Denoise AI if needed to further clean up my files.
Tom
Merci super, ici 150-600 x1,4 + OM1
Hi Fabrice,
I do not own an OM1 so I will not be doing any testing of the 150-600 with that camera body.
Tom
Hi Mr Thomas
Do you notice “noticeable” differences in ISO performance and focus speed (with all the firmware updates) between the MX1 and the Oly OM-D E-M1 III in your “practice”, day-to-day real-life? In the EU, both models are around the same price now, in the used market… And I’m
Hi Antonio,
I don’t use my wife’s E-M1 Mark III very often, but when I have I’ve not noticed any differences with ISO performance. Focus speed with both cameras is very good. I haven’t used her camera enough to make a comparative comment. The E-M1 Mark III does not provide AI Subject Tracking so it does not meet my needs with bird photography.
Her camera is much lighter, but does not provide the comfort, handling and ergonomics of my E-M1X. If I use her camera for more than an hour, even with lighter lenses I get a cramp in my right forearm. With heavier lenses like the PRO 40-150 f/2.8 or larger lenses the cramping happens within a few minutes.
Tom
Very good idea Thomas to test and practice BIF from that point of view you seem to have captured everything well.
It’s interesting that you used the 100-400 to capture the shots too. That’s a lens that I am testing this month with a view to purchase with a 30% discount code I have from OM Systems.
Thanks again
Mark
Hi Mark,
The 100-400 is a very good lens which I have enjoyed using for a number of years. Being compatible with M.Zuiko teleconverters give the lens a lot of in-field flexibility, especially with the MC-14… with only one stop of light loss. I still use my 100-400 periodically when I want something lighter and smaller than my 150-600… but with more reach than my wife’s 75-300 II.
Tom